This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
app:sinw [2018/02/02 11:22] pklapetek |
app:sinw [2018/02/02 11:26] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Geometrical parameters of a single column were as follows in first set of simulations (radii of nested cylinders capped by spheres and apparent thickness of the film if seen from side): | Geometrical parameters of a single column were as follows in first set of simulations (radii of nested cylinders capped by spheres and apparent thickness of the film if seen from side): | ||
- | <poem> | + | ^ material ^ cylinder radius ^ film thickness ^ |
- | material cylinder radius film thickness | + | | Si NW | 28 nm | | |
- | Si NW 28 nm | + | | (i) a:Si-H | 161 nm | 67 nm | |
- | (i) a:Si-H 161 nm 67 nm | + | | (n) a:Si-H | 182 nm | 11 nm | |
- | (n) a:Si-H 182 nm 11 nm | + | | TCO | 350 nm | 84 nm | |
- | TCO 350 nm 84 nm | + | |
- | </poem> | + | |
Bottom ITO thickness was 630 nm. All these parameters can be changed and were considered only as initial values, a bit smaller than ideal values, to speed up the first test calculations. | Bottom ITO thickness was 630 nm. All these parameters can be changed and were considered only as initial values, a bit smaller than ideal values, to speed up the first test calculations. |