This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
app:sinw [2018/02/02 11:25] pklapetek |
app:sinw [2018/02/02 11:26] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
^ material ^ cylinder radius ^ film thickness ^ | ^ material ^ cylinder radius ^ film thickness ^ | ||
- | | Row 1 Col 1 | Row 1 Col 2 | Row 1 Col 3 | | + | | Si NW | 28 nm | | |
- | | Row 2 Col 1 | some colspan (note the double pipe) || | + | | (i) a:Si-H | 161 nm | 67 nm | |
- | | Row 3 Col 1 | Row 3 Col 2 | Row 3 Col 3 | | + | | (n) a:Si-H | 182 nm | 11 nm | |
+ | | TCO | 350 nm | 84 nm | | ||
- | <poem> | ||
- | material cylinder radius film thickness | ||
- | Si NW 28 nm | ||
- | (i) a:Si-H 161 nm 67 nm | ||
- | (n) a:Si-H 182 nm 11 nm | ||
- | TCO 350 nm 84 nm | ||
- | </poem> | ||
Bottom ITO thickness was 630 nm. All these parameters can be changed and were considered only as initial values, a bit smaller than ideal values, to speed up the first test calculations. | Bottom ITO thickness was 630 nm. All these parameters can be changed and were considered only as initial values, a bit smaller than ideal values, to speed up the first test calculations. |