This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
docs:become [2020/04/14 14:31] pklapetek |
docs:become [2020/04/15 23:29] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
periodic calculation (based on a single motive) where the far field is evaluated from three | periodic calculation (based on a single motive) where the far field is evaluated from three | ||
and nine virtual repetitions are then compared to the case where the calculation is not periodic | and nine virtual repetitions are then compared to the case where the calculation is not periodic | ||
- | and three apertures are physically existing in the computational domain. | + | and three apertures are physically existing in the computational domain. The schematics of |
+ | the calculations is here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:docs:schematics.png?600|}} | ||
An important message is that | An important message is that | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
* default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.178 | * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.178 | ||
- | Dependence on problem size: | + | |
+ | After improving nearly everyting (CPML, periodic borders, source) the result is even worse, 0.148 for the fitted metal. However, now the result is fully symmetric. | ||