This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
docs:become [2020/04/14 14:31] pklapetek |
docs:become [2020/04/16 11:25] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
periodic calculation (based on a single motive) where the far field is evaluated from three | periodic calculation (based on a single motive) where the far field is evaluated from three | ||
and nine virtual repetitions are then compared to the case where the calculation is not periodic | and nine virtual repetitions are then compared to the case where the calculation is not periodic | ||
- | and three apertures are physically existing in the computational domain. | + | and three apertures are physically existing in the computational domain. The schematics of |
+ | the calculations is here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:docs:schematics.png?600|}} | ||
An important message is that | An important message is that | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
* default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.178 | * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.178 | ||
- | Dependence on problem size: | + | |
+ | After improving nearly everything (CPML, periodic borders, source) the result is even worse, 0.148 for the fitted metal, spacing 10 nm. However, now the result is fully symmetric and does not depend on voxel size (0.147 for spacing 5 nm). | ||