Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- docs:become [2020/04/16 11:25]
pklapetek
+++ docs:become [2020/04/19 15:42]
pklapetek
@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 however it is still unclear if this is the only effect. The backup files for this calculation are {{ :docs:2d_transmission_aperture_backup_files.tar.gz |here}}.//
+Accuracy aspects (evaluated on the single aperture transmission):
+   * effect of time step is small, prolonging it from dt=0.5 Courant limit to 0.25 does not change the shape of the curve in a detectable way.
+   * effect of absorbing boundary type smaller or distance to the boundary much smaller (mostly invisible, below percent?). The transmission around zero order is larger slightly when Liao condition is used instead of CPML.
+   * effect of NFFF box size is up to 6 percent for the maximum difference of intensities at the first diffraction order (NFFF box sizes from 100x20 to 340x130, when y size is evaluated from the aperture plane and even for maximum NFFF the boundary in x is about 200 voxels far). Smaller NFFF box seems to be better; when it is enlarged artefacts can be seen. There is always a difference between analytical model that does not go to zero for maximum angles, and numerical
+model that goes to almost zero.
 ----

GSvit documentation