This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
docs:become [2020/04/22 14:42] pklapetek |
docs:become [2020/04/22 15:22] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
The two models that were compared are shown below. | The two models that were compared are shown below. | ||
+ | {{:docs:schematics_reflection_pec.png?600|}} | ||
The periodic calculation was done the same | The periodic calculation was done the same | ||
Line 69: | Line 70: | ||
The results show that the correspondence between the 19 apertures manual model and the periodic model with evaluating 19 near-field repetitions for the far field calculation are comparable to about 4 percents. Better correspondence could be obtained if the manual domain would be further extended (as seen from the smaller domain calculations trends). | The results show that the correspondence between the 19 apertures manual model and the periodic model with evaluating 19 near-field repetitions for the far field calculation are comparable to about 4 percents. Better correspondence could be obtained if the manual domain would be further extended (as seen from the smaller domain calculations trends). | ||
+ | {{:docs:validation.png?800|}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The backup files are {{ :docs:2d_reflection_cpml_backup_files.tar.gz |here}}. | ||
---- | ---- |