GSvit documentation

open source FDTD solver with GPU support

User Tools

Site Tools


docs:become

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:44]
pklapetek
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:47]
pklapetek
Line 91: Line 91:
  
 The image below shows the normalized angular dependence of the diffraction from the (finite size) grating. The image below shows the normalized angular dependence of the diffraction from the (finite size) grating.
-{{:​docs:​result_twomethods.png?​600|}}+{{:​docs:​result_twomethods.png?​800|}}
  
 When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between
-the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case. However, +the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case.  
-the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, which is less than +Again we expect that this difference is given by the difference in models - big single calculation 
-expected (0.178). Something has to be wrong.+has to work with limited source size and repeated calculations work with infinitely periodic field 
 +even if they are not infinitely periodic. 
 +A bigger problem is that the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, ​ 
 +which is less than expected (the expected value is 0.178). Something has to be wrong.
  
 The first suspect is the refractive index. The first suspect is the refractive index.
docs/become.txt · Last modified: 2020/04/24 12:27 by pklapetek