This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:45] pklapetek |
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:47] pklapetek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between | When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between | ||
- | the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case. However, | + | the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case. |
- | the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, which is less than | + | Again we expect that this difference is given by the difference in models - big single calculation |
- | expected (0.178). Something has to be wrong. | + | has to work with limited source size and repeated calculations work with infinitely periodic field |
+ | even if they are not infinitely periodic. | ||
+ | A bigger problem is that the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, | ||
+ | which is less than expected (the expected value is 0.178). Something has to be wrong. | ||
The first suspect is the refractive index. | The first suspect is the refractive index. |