GSvit documentation

open source FDTD solver with GPU support

User Tools

Site Tools


docs:become

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:45]
pklapetek
docs:become [2020/04/22 22:08]
pklapetek
Line 94: Line 94:
  
 When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between When inspected in detail, it can be seen that there is a difference of about 3 percents between
-the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case. However, +the two methods output for the first diffraction maximum, similarly to the PEC case.  
-the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, which is less than +Again we expect that this difference is given by the difference in models - big single calculation 
-expected (0.178). Something has to be wrong.+has to work with limited source size and repeated calculations work with infinitely periodic field 
 +even if they are not infinitely periodic. 
 +A bigger problem is that the diffracted intensity is about 0.147 of the incident intensity, ​ 
 +which is less than expected (the expected value is 0.178). Something has to be wrong.
  
 The first suspect is the refractive index. The first suspect is the refractive index.
Line 105: Line 108:
 To compare its impact on results, here is a list of different metal model settings and results: To compare its impact on results, here is a list of different metal model settings and results:
  
-   * the fitted metal setting: 6 1.03583 0 1.37537e+16 1.25733e+14 ​ 2.1735 -0.504659 7.60514e+15 4.28131e+15 ​  ​0.554478 -1.48944 6.13809e+15 6.62262e+14 means n=(0.129 + 3.87i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.147 +   * the fitted metal setting: 6 1.03583 0 1.37537e+16 1.25733e+14 ​ 2.1735 -0.504659 7.60514e+15 4.28131e+15 ​  ​0.554478 -1.48944 6.13809e+15 6.62262e+14 means n=(0.129 + 3.87i) and leads to first order diffraction ​intensity ​of 0.147 
-   * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of XXX (i.e. better than now).+   * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction ​intensity ​of 0.150.
  
 Another suspect is the voxel spacing. However, at least for 5 nm and 10 nm voxel spacing the resulting diffraction maximum was nearly same (less than 0.5 percent difference). Another suspect is the voxel spacing. However, at least for 5 nm and 10 nm voxel spacing the resulting diffraction maximum was nearly same (less than 0.5 percent difference).
docs/become.txt · Last modified: 2020/04/24 12:27 by pklapetek