GSvit documentation

open source FDTD solver with GPU support

User Tools

Site Tools


docs:become

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
docs:become [2020/04/22 21:47]
pklapetek
docs:become [2020/04/22 22:08]
pklapetek
Line 108: Line 108:
 To compare its impact on results, here is a list of different metal model settings and results: To compare its impact on results, here is a list of different metal model settings and results:
  
-   * the fitted metal setting: 6 1.03583 0 1.37537e+16 1.25733e+14 ​ 2.1735 -0.504659 7.60514e+15 4.28131e+15 ​  ​0.554478 -1.48944 6.13809e+15 6.62262e+14 means n=(0.129 + 3.87i) and leads to first order diffraction of 0.147 +   * the fitted metal setting: 6 1.03583 0 1.37537e+16 1.25733e+14 ​ 2.1735 -0.504659 7.60514e+15 4.28131e+15 ​  ​0.554478 -1.48944 6.13809e+15 6.62262e+14 means n=(0.129 + 3.87i) and leads to first order diffraction ​intensity ​of 0.147 
-   * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction of XXX (i.e. better than now).+   * default metal setting: 6 0.89583 0 13.8737e15 0.0207332e15 1.3735 -0.504659 7.59914e15 4.28431e15 0.304478 -1.48944 6.15009e15 0.659262e15 means n=(0.036 + 4.147i) and leads to first order diffraction ​intensity ​of 0.150.
  
 Another suspect is the voxel spacing. However, at least for 5 nm and 10 nm voxel spacing the resulting diffraction maximum was nearly same (less than 0.5 percent difference). Another suspect is the voxel spacing. However, at least for 5 nm and 10 nm voxel spacing the resulting diffraction maximum was nearly same (less than 0.5 percent difference).
docs/become.txt · Last modified: 2020/04/24 12:27 by pklapetek