GSvit documentation

open source FDTD solver with GPU support

User Tools

Site Tools


fdtd:materials

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
fdtd:materials [2018/02/01 14:19]
pklapetek
fdtd:materials [2018/08/28 13:08] (current)
pklapetek
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 The figure above shows spectral dependences of metal surface reflectivity for different materials and different numerical techniques. Note that Chromium curves are almost entirely identical (so that ADE curve is hidden behind the RC one), and also Aluminum curves are very similar. For gold, slightly different dispersive properties were used for RC and for ADE/PLRC technique, using those presented in original papers, so the curves are not expected to be identical. Also, PLRC and ADE result for gold is indistinguishable. The figure above shows spectral dependences of metal surface reflectivity for different materials and different numerical techniques. Note that Chromium curves are almost entirely identical (so that ADE curve is hidden behind the RC one), and also Aluminum curves are very similar. For gold, slightly different dispersive properties were used for RC and for ADE/PLRC technique, using those presented in original papers, so the curves are not expected to be identical. Also, PLRC and ADE result for gold is indistinguishable.
 +
 +----
 +//
 +{{ :​samples:​img_metal.png?​100|}}
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​metal.tar.gz|reflection from metallic surface}}.
 +\\
 +A 40x40x610 computational domain with periodic boundary conditions used to calculate the reflection from a thick metallic film. For spectral dependence, this was repeated for each wavelength and ratio between results of "​reflection.par"​ and "​reference.par"​ (without film) calculation was used to determine the reflection coefficient.
 +//
 +----
 +
fdtd/materials.1517491184.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2018/02/01 14:19 by pklapetek