GSvit documentation

open source FDTD solver with GPU support

User Tools

Site Tools


fdtd:sources

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
fdtd:sources [2018/01/29 16:03]
pklapetek
fdtd:sources [2018/01/30 22:08]
pklapetek
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
-To perform a computation we need to setup at least single source of electromagnetic field. The simplest source is a point one, which is physically similar to a small dipole. More rigorous is an electric or magnetic current source which has exactly the same funcionality ​as the electric or magnetic dipole.+To perform a computation we need to setup at least single source of electromagnetic field. The simplest source is a point one, which is physically similar to a small dipole. More rigorous is an electric or magnetic current source which has exactly the same functionality ​as the electric or magnetic dipole. 
 + 
 +---- 
 +// 
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_point.png?​100|}} 
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_point.tar.gz|point source}}. 
 +\\ 
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with single point source and a metallic sphere made of a perfect electric conductor. 
 +// 
 +----
  
 If we need a plane wave to interact with our computation volume, we are no more able to use a set of point sources (unless we have extremely large computational volume which is unrealistic. Special techniques need to be used, for example one known as total/​scattered field or scattered field. Both approaches are based on addition and eventually subtraction of precomputed plane wave to/from some points in the computational volume. If we need a plane wave to interact with our computation volume, we are no more able to use a set of point sources (unless we have extremely large computational volume which is unrealistic. Special techniques need to be used, for example one known as total/​scattered field or scattered field. Both approaches are based on addition and eventually subtraction of precomputed plane wave to/from some points in the computational volume.
  
 +
 +
 +In total/​scattered field (TSF) technique we draw a boundary around the area where we need the plane wave and we add the plane wave on one side and subtract it on other side (depending on wave traveling direction). There can be anything inside TSF volume as there are no special algorithms run there.
  
 +----
 +//
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_tsf.png?​100|}}
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_tsf.tar.gz|total/​scattered field source}}.
 +\\
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with total/​scattered field source and a metallic sphere made of a perfect electric conductor.
 +//
 ---- ----
  
-//Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_point.tar.gz|point source}}.//​{{ :​samples:​img_source_point.png?​100|}} 
  
 +In scattered field (SF) formulation,​ we only add the plane wave on tangential electric field components of interface between conductor and non-conductor,​ simulating the fact that in real world there are currents cancelling the tangetial components of electromagnetic wave generated on such interface. At it's simplest variant this technique is therefore not suitable for dielectrics and it is used for calculations consisting of perfect electric conductors in a free space. However, comparing to TSF, it can provide more accurate results for scattering calculations in these cases.
 +
 +----
 +//
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_sf.png?​100|}}
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_sf.tar.gz|scattered field source}}.
 +\\
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with scattered field source and a metallic sphere made of a perfect electric conductor.
 +//
 ---- ----
  
 +To get focused source we can use plane waves summation method.
  
-In total/​scattered field (TSF) technique we draw a boundary around the area where we need the plane wave and we add the plane wave on one side and subtract it on other side (depending on wave traveling direction). There can be anything inside TSF volume as there are no special algorithms run there.+---- 
 +// 
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_tsff.png?​100|}} 
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_tsff.tar.gz|total/​scattered ​focused ​field source}}. 
 +\\ 
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with focused source ​and a metallic sphere made of a perfect electric conductor. 
 +// 
 +----
  
-//Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_tsf.tar.gz|total/​scattered field source}}.//+Layered ​source
  
-In scattered field (SF) formulation,​ we only add the plane wave on tangential electric field components of interface between conductor and non-conductor,​ simulating the fact that in real world there are currents cancelling the tangetial components of electromagnetic wave generated on such interface. At it's simplest variant this technique is therefore not suitable for dielectrics and it is used for calculations consisting of perfect electric conductors in a free space. However, comparing to TSF, it can provide more accurate results for scattering calculations in these cases.+{{ :​samples:​ltsf.png?600 |}}
  
 +----
 +//
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_ltsf.png?​100|}}
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:​source_ltsf.tar.gz|layers compatible field source}}.
 +\\
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with source compatible with infinitely extending layers.
 +//
 +----
  
-//Sample parameter file: {{samples:source_sf.tar.gz|scattered ​field source}}.//+ 
 +Layered focused source 
 + 
 +---- 
 +// 
 +{{ :​samples:​img_source_ltsff.png?​100|}} 
 +Sample parameter file: {{samples:source_ltsff.tar.gz|layers compatible focused ​field source}}. 
 +\\ 
 +A 200x200x200 computational domain with focused source compatible with infinitely extending layers. 
 +// 
 +----
  
fdtd/sources.txt · Last modified: 2018/08/28 15:18 by pklapetek